You're welcome to follow the Stable Release Update procedure as Steve Langasek suggested. Someone else came along and marked the task Invalid. If you feel it should be updated, by all means complete the process for the update. If the upstream and Debian updates were only bug fixes, then you have a good chance of getting in a stable release update. If there were features, you should instead file for a backport: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports
On 02/02/2011 05:45 PM, Jim Kelly wrote: > Usually I feel that the Ubuntu guys are all over it. This isn't one of those > times. This application is often used. It makes sense to me the the LTS > Lucid would include this as an update, same as they would many others. > I think peer-to-peer file sharing probably ranks darn high on the "often > used" list of features" > Do we really want Ubuntu users looking at a "Ancient version" message and > having a version straight out of the Ubuntu store in the most recent LTS that > won't connect without alot of coaxing because it wasn't update for 2 years > running? > Seriously - I think a yearly update to the repo for the LTS is in order for > this application. > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538900 Title: [FFe] sync gtk-gnutella 0.96.8-1 from debian unstable -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
