As far as I'm concerned, that's acceptable - perhaps even desirable behaviour. For example if you moved your status and applications bar to the left monitor then the icons would have to move down (which is probably how windows/macos would do it), but it doesn't seem like a big issue to me.
More importantly - or illogically, why do the icons not fill on the main display first? If the extended display is not always on, this causes mounted drive icons, etc to go missing. Related to that, why does it always assume that the left screen is the default one (even when you have the menu and applications bars on the right display as the OP (and I) do. Not everyone has the luxury of putting the extended monitor on the right side. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498940 Title: Background icons layout problem while using dual monitors -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
