Added backports for Lucid, Karmic and Hardy to be included for the next
proposed cycle. It was decided to skip Dapper. First I could not see
that problem there (there were rather other problem which I could not
really claim to be a regression as its not clear how well xfs worked
back then). Also the additional patch notes that performance should be
ok with the radix based inode tree. That was not there before Hardy. So
better leave things alone unless someone has real issues.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848
Title:
Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT
errno = 22
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
