Michael and I researched and discussed this in IRC recently.

First of all, the code in the ecryptfs-utils pre-removal script is doing
exactly what it is supposed to do -- it detects that you are in fact
using ecryptfs for your encrypted home or encrypted private and the pre-
removal script *refuses* to allow ecryptfs to be removed.  Otherwise, if
ecryptfs-utils was successfully removed, you would be completely locked
out of your home or private, until you forcibly reinstalled ecryptfs-
utils.

That said, there is a bug here, in why apt thinks that ecryptfs-utils
can be removed.

Michael suggested that perhaps the best solution to this problem would
be to have adduser recommend (rather than suggest) ecryptfs-utils.  I
agree with his assessment.  I'm moving this bug over to adduser, and
will fix it there in Natty.

This is, perhaps, a candidate for an SRU, IMHO, as there have been many,
many duplicates.

** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)

** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: adduser (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: adduser (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: adduser (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: adduser (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)

** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
       Status: In Progress => Invalid

** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653628

Title:
  package ecryptfs-utils 83-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error
  exit status 1

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to