... so Papukaija's pointed to a link that provides a guideline on how to judge whether a problem is worthy of being addressed. Of course these kind of guidelines serve a purpose, however in this case it seems a narrow definition is being used as a reason for preventing a potentially significant improvement from getting addressed. Can't we look at the big picture here? Contrast Ubuntu One with Dropbox - would Dropbox's consider it "unimportant" if a significant contingent of it's customer base couldn't access it's services? I doubt it!
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387308 Title: HTTPS Proxy Support for file sync -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
