On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:05:19 -0000 Scott Moser <smo...@canonical.com> wrote:
> I think it would be probably best to post this upstream and see what > their response is. Upstream has mailing list info at [2]. i thought so too. this is what karel said: "I'm still not sure if mount(8) is the right place to fix odd kernel behaviour. Anyway, your patch seems like a usable workaround. I'll try to apply the patch later (it will necessary to modify libmount, because the library is not able to add a new entry to mtab for MS_REMOUNT requests)." http://marc.info/?l=util-linux-ng&m=129827998111793&w=2 maybe on could convince the kernel guys to think over the underlying problem, but i don't have enough insights to do a good enough bug report and argue with them. i skimmed through the kernel's mounting source, but it's not as easy understandable as mount itself :) maybe someone at canoncial could try? -- lg, ameno -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712892 Title: mount (silently) ignores options for bind mounts -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
