The theory here was that the two groups would be used independently:
* The old, simple naming. (A base name, and effectively two flags, one for
Bold, one for Italic)
* The new, detailed naming. (Base Family, weights, obliqueness angles,
full-text subnames ... the full works)
I think the situation we're getting into with (something in) the stack
that Inkscape and/or GNOME are using is that data from both sets is
being used. So probably the Bold "flag" is being seen on both of the
fonts and therefore the second being discarded. The actual raw
FontConfig data:
$ fc-list | grep Ubuntu | grep -v Mono
Ubuntu,Ubuntu Light:style=Light,Regular
Ubuntu:style=Bold Italic
Ubuntu:style=Bold
Ubuntu:style=Italic
UbuntuHebrewBeta:style=Regular
Ubuntu,Ubuntu Light:style=Medium Italic,Bold Italic
UbuntuArabicBeta:style=Regular
Ubuntu,Ubuntu Light:style=Light Italic,Italic
Ubuntu:style=Regular
Ubuntu,Ubuntu Light:style=Medium,Bold
** Also affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741813
Title:
Technical: Light and medium are confused by LibreOffice and GNOME in
0.71.2
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
