Although perhaps @Erfan is out of line in his intensity, I have used the same words myself (see #3) in a softer way. But one should think that, if FS and OS communities are so quite and polite, why there are some people that complain in that way? It is a response for their frustration after having been used by Canonical as guinea pigs. I personally believe that Unity was (and still is) in a too much early state and that to release in such a state a software, on which the user experience depends so much, has been a big mistake and a wrong decision by Mark Shuttleworth.
I know that the variety of projects is part of the FS and OS community's strength, but I did no understand why they begun to work in first place in this project having already projects like their own netbook-launcher, Gnome-Do or Docky and, furthermore, with the imminent release of Gnome Shell (which in my opinion will change the DE and DM paradigm of the GNU/Linux world). I really hope that @Mikkel and @Bilal are right and that Unity has been improved in 11.04, but this does not change what has been done. Moreover, Canonical has lost part of my confidence with this move (and others). Even though, I will surely give it a try (hoping it does not sucks ;) ). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648180 Title: Unity sucks -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
