Another bug (754418) was made a dup of this one. That bug noted that current Natty yelp docs are based on Gnome 3, whereas Ubuntu Natty has Gnome 2.
>From the ubuntu-docs list it looks like the ubuntu-docs team is working heroically to modify the Gnome-3 set of Mallard topics to make it appropriate for Ubuntu Natty (while perhaps also keeping maverick Ubuntu Docs available for "classic" desktop). I wonder whether this is the best approach for Ubuntu users. It raises the question: is content being driven by the toolchain (Gnome 3 Yelp uses Mallard, whereas Maverick Ubuntu Help Center uses docbook)? (Ubuntu Docs in Maverick was well translated into many languages, and translation of Gnome 3 topics + new Ubuntu Topics is at best uncertain.) Another approach would be to ask: What do Ubuntu Natty users need for content (on-disk/online)? Then let content development flow from that (with due consideration of delivery formats and localization). A related question is: how important is it that content be independent from the display application (yelp)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753072 Title: yelp docs not about ubuntu natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
