It certainly could be. This succeeds: md5sum -c /var/lib/dpkg/info/libpam0g:amd64.md5sums md5sum -c /var/lib/dpkg/info/libpam-modules:amd64.md5sums
However, assuming that the md5sums are valid, it still seems like it would be bad policy to have two packages out of thousands that do not verify with debsums. My personal opinion is that the problem should be fixed in the pam packages, but I'm not sure what the relevant policy is. So, should debsums get a bug for not handling a special edge case, or should the pam packages be modified to work properly with debsums? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776030 Title: libpam0g & libpam-modules fail integrity check with debsums -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
