Matt, Your ID of (011) doesn't make a lot of sense, since that would be the next logical "xM C++" aka "xM D" revision would be.. ;)
Maybe Koen knows something we don't, when he implemented the "omap3: beagle: if rev unknown, assume xM revision C" part of the xM C changeset... Regards, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770679 Title: Missing proper support for Beagle XM rev B and C -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
