Launchpad has imported 14 comments from the remote bug at http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10856.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-27T23:54:55+00:00 Matthias Klose wrote: The patch to fix PR gas/10704 causes sha.cpp assembled in a way that causes the sha-256 test not to terminate. Undoing the patch runs the test fine. Replacing the sha.o with one assembled with gas having this patch reverted lets the test pass. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-27T23:55:37+00:00 Matthias Klose wrote: Created attachment 4329 diff of disassembled files Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-27T23:56:18+00:00 Matthias Klose wrote: Created attachment 4330 sha .s and .o files Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-28T02:53:32+00:00 Alan Modra wrote: Simpler testcase: .text .intel_syntax noprefix .space 5480 .byte 0,0,0 0: .space 1620 .byte 0 1: .space 2468 nop jne 1b .space 52 nop jl 0b Without the .intel_syntax this assembles OK. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-28T08:21:59+00:00 Cvs-commit wrote: Subject: Bug 10856 CVSROOT: /cvs/src Module name: src Changes by: [email protected] 2009-10-28 08:21:45 Modified files: gas : ChangeLog expr.c gas/testsuite : ChangeLog gas/testsuite/gas/i386: intelpic.d Log message: PR gas/10856 * expr.c (resolve_expression): Only add "left" value to O_symbol expression when the symbol is undefined and different from the original symbol. Simplify negative logic. * gas/i386/intelpic.d: Correct. Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.3999&r2=1.4000 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/expr.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.78&r2=1.79 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1573&r2=1.1574 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/intelpic.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.3&r2=1.4 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-28T08:24:03+00:00 Cvs-commit wrote: Subject: Bug 10856 CVSROOT: /cvs/src Module name: src Branch: binutils-2_20-branch Changes by: [email protected] 2009-10-28 08:23:49 Modified files: gas : ChangeLog expr.c Log message: PR gas/10856 * expr.c (resolve_expression): Only add "left" value to O_symbol expression when the symbol is undefined and different from the original symbol. Simplify negative logic. Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_20-branch&r1=1.3938.2.27&r2=1.3938.2.28 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/expr.c.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_20-branch&r1=1.77.2.1&r2=1.77.2.2 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-28T10:03:48+00:00 Matthias Klose wrote: checked that the sha test passes, when sha.o is built with this patch. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-28T10:08:48+00:00 Alan Modra wrote: . Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-11-05T12:14:29+00:00 Alan Modra wrote: *** Bug 10906 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-13T17:55:22+00:00 David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: Any indication of when this fix is likely to get into a release? The more OS distributions as 2.20 goes into, the more problems this bug will cause. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-13T21:00:41+00:00 Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote: This launchpad page tracks the increasing number of OS distributions and open source projects that are being negatively affected by the bug in 2.20: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fedora/+source/binutils/+bug/461303 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-14T09:04:48+00:00 Gingold wrote: Subject: Re: [2.20 regression] gas creates wrong code which results in a test failure in libcrypto++'s sha2 test On Dec 13, 2009, at 6:55 PM, david-sarah at jacaranda dot org wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From david-sarah at jacaranda dot org 2009-12-13 > 17:55 ------- > Any indication of when this fix is likely to get into a release? The more OS > distributions as 2.20 goes into, the more problems this bug will cause. I agree that this is annoying. What about a 2.20.1 release in January ? Tristan. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-07-06T04:44:56+00:00 Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote: Hey folks, some distributions such as MinGW have still not patched their version of binutils or reverted to binutils 2.19: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2913876&group_id=2435&atid=102435 This is still causing problems for my users: http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/853 If you folks could go ahead and release a binutil 2.20.1 then that might stimulate distributors like MinGW to upgrade to it and that would fix the problem for my users. Thanks! Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-12-19T18:18:07+00:00 Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote: binutils 2.20.1, released 2010-03-03, does *not* have the ChangeLog entry from http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10856#c5 but *does* have the patch to expr.c. Weird. But I guess it is fixed in binutils 2.20.1. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/461303/comments/37 ** Changed in: binutils Importance: Unknown => Medium ** Bug watch added: Tahoe-LAFS Trac #853 http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/853 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461303 Title: generates-bad-code regression -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
