Public bug reported:
Following on from bug #650889 ("Ubuntu Font Family 0.69+ufl would be
valuable for older releases") and bug #709980 ("SRU ubuntu-font-family
0.70.1 for *") it would be useful to make 0.71.2 available in older
maintained releases:
<thorwil> hmm, i have no light cut of the Ubuntu font at all
<thorwil> 0.70.1-0 claims to be latest ttf-ubuntu-font-family [... in
Maverick]
Note that because of bug #744812 ("FontConfig/Qt stack choke on Ubuntu
Medium font meta-data (No medium in Inkscape and too bold in Qt apps)"),
the Medium ('Ubuntu-M.ttf' and 'Ubuntu-MI.ttf') should be dropped from
the binary before backporting/SRUing.
** Affects: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
Following on from bug #650889 ("Ubuntu Font Family 0.69+ufl would be
valuable for older releases") and bug #709980 ("SRU ubuntu-font-family
0.70.1 for *") it would be useful to make 0.71.2 available in older
maintained releases:
- <thorwil> hmm, i have no light cut of the Ubuntu font at all
- <thorwil> 0.70.1-0 claims to be latest ttf-ubuntu-font-family [... in
Maverick]
+ <thorwil> hmm, i have no light cut of the Ubuntu font at all
+ <thorwil> 0.70.1-0 claims to be latest ttf-ubuntu-font-family [... in
Maverick]
+
+ Note that because of bug #744812 ("FontConfig/Qt stack choke on Ubuntu
+ Medium font meta-data (No medium in Inkscape and too bold in Qt apps)"),
+ the Medium ('Ubuntu-M.ttf' and 'Ubuntu-MI.ttf') should be dropped from
+ the binary before backporting/SRUing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797034
Title:
SRU: ubuntu-font-family 0.71.2 (minus Medium) to *
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-font-family-sources/+bug/797034/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
