Thanks, Colin.
I don't remember doing this packaging myself, and I can't say that I've
ever used the python bindings either. I believe that these are
vestigial remnants of some key escrow service work Michael Halcrow had
started.
python-libecryptfs is perfectly fine by me. We can drop the "-utils"
from the path, so just ecryptfs/libecryptfs.
I don't know of a single person using this module. I don't think a
transition is required.
If you could propose a merge to lp:ecryptfs, that would be ideal.
Thanks.
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800647
Title:
Python module packaged in very non-standard way
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/800647/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
