I'm out of the office until 1st August. On 6 Jun 2011, at 09:48, David Marshall <[email protected]> wrote:
> I did my own investigation of the font files using version 0.4 of the > monospace. The Regular, Italic, and Bold are all 100% to-spec > monospace > fonts. There is a small metrics bug in the Bold Italic which means > it's > not quite a to-spec monospace font. > > The odd thing is the applications which are picking the Bold Italic up > as the only weight, when in fact it's the only weight which isn't > quite > right. So yes, we need to fix the Bold Italic, but it looks like we've > tickled some odd app bugs too. > > Dave > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu > Font Family Drivers, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Font Family. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076 > > Title: > Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bolded > italic > > Status in GNU Emacs: > New > Status in Ubuntu Font Family: > Incomplete > Status in “emacs23” package in Ubuntu: > Triaged > > Bug description: > I just installed the beta Ubuntu Mono space font and when i tried in > Emacs by: "Options--> Set Default Font -->UbuntuBeta Mono, regular", > the bolded italic was displayed instead (see the attachment). Any > clue why this happened and how to fix it? > > Forwarded upstream: > > "23.2: graphical Emacs chooses Bold-Italic when regular monospace > font chosen" > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8798 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791076 Title: Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/emacs/+bug/791076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
