Hi Leann,

The patch you said is included upstream was reverted the next day in
v2.6.38-rc2, so the reason given for Fix Released status is not
applicable.

I don't have permission to revert the status change, so please do that
if you agree.

$ git describe --contains 6b35eb9ddcddde7b510726de03fae071178f1ec4
v2.6.38-rc2~32^2~1

commit 6b35eb9ddcddde7b510726de03fae071178f1ec4
Author: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Jan 19 10:09:42 2011 +0100

    Revert "x86: Make relocatable kernel work with new binutils"
    
    This reverts commit 86b1e8dd83cb ("x86: Make relocatable kernel work with
    new binutils").
    
    Markus Trippelsdorf reported a boot failure caused by this patch.

It might be that the issue does not occur with the binutils in Oneiric
anyway, as the reverted kernel patch (86b1e8dd83cb) mentions a binutils
version range with an upper limit.  I have not tried building a kernel
with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y on Oneiric to find out.  If binutils behaviour
was changed a second time, fixing this issue, it might be more helpful
to backport the binutils change to Maverick instead of a kernel change.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673236

Title:
  maverick toolchain producing unbootable (hanging) kernels

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/673236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to