Retitling and reopening as per previous comment.
However, I still don't understand the rationale for having a machine
type whitelist.; see (2) in comment 5. Do we have hard data that
hibernation is consistently broken on some particular hardware, and the
reason isn't just partitioning?
My gut feeling is that we should just disable hibernation by default,
period (and perhaps provide an Ui configuration bit to enable it).
Maintaining and checking a whitelist will just cause a lot of
unnecessary effort which won't actually help a lot.
** Summary changed:
- Disable suspend/hibernate options when they are not supported
+ Disable hibernate option when it is not supported
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812394
Title:
Disable hibernate option when it is not supported
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/812394/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
