I made a mistake previously and would like to clear it up. The mistake
was a result of not giving something enough time and testing. I have now
tested it more thoroughly and have more to report:

Using the modified (no sparse irq) kernel with kernel parameter
i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 DOES increase battery life compared to without
that kernel parameter. The only problem is that it also brings back the
graphical glitches and freezes, which were the ONLY reason I wanted to
switch to kernel 3.x in the first place. Thus, that kernel parameter in
concert with disabling sparse irq in the kernel solves the power problem
(completely or almost completely), but the i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 kernel
parameter brings back the glitchy graphics from kernel 2.6.x.

I have also added this comment to the ubuntuforums thread.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834037

Title:
  Huge power regression in kernel 3.x on Sandy Bridge laptops

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/834037/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to