On 08/23/2011 11:54 PM, Björn Michaelsen wrote: >> I don't like how this FFe was granted; apparently LO 3.4 was never built >> before on armel and powerpc, and promptly failed to build., > > That does not match up with your requests on IRC to _not_ test in PPAs but > directly in the distro -- unless you are searching for reasons to complain.
wrong. I didn't see any uploads to the libreoffice PPA either. please get some exposure to the community early. I did hope that the development behind the curtain did have an end with OOo, and didn't propagate to LO. >> There is no reason, why such an upload cannot happen before feature freeze, >> and no reason that these architectures are not tested before an upload. > > There are very good reasons for other non-x86 archs to be tested last: Build > time, compile cylces, availability on PPAs are just a few. there's no reason to build at least once on a developer machine. These are available for a reason. > And yes, next time when I bite my nails out with some problem like the mono > one > here, I will first see if somebody already caused a FTBFS with the current LO > version by changes in one of LOs deps before trying to find what errors was > introduced in LO. this is development. detect it early and file reports. if mono is such a pain, please consider dropping support for mono. > But rather than wasting my time argueing here, I'd prefer to get something > constructive done, so lets please put this to rest here. if you want to be constructive, please address these issues. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828724 Title: [FFE] LibreOffice 3.4 for Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/828724/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
