On 23/09/2011 08:21, Mitsuya Shibata wrote: > @hyperair > > 2011/9/23 Chow Loong Jin <[email protected]>: >> I'd actually prefer to merge the synaptic and apturl patches together >> (and propagate this change to Debian, but there's no time for that). > > I think that shouldn't merge synaptic/apturl patch by two reasons. > > First, Ubuntu dropped synaptic from desktop task, but not in Debian. > > Second, apturl isn't packaged in Debian yet. > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=apturl&searchon=names&suite=unstable§ion=all > > That is, apturl patch is ubuntu specific, can't propagate to Debian > at this time. I think it is better to separate Debian specific patch > and Ubuntu it for next(o+1) merge.
I see, you have a point there. In that case I'd actually prefer to just merge/amend the 02 patch in an -XubuntuY version (and keep it as Synaptic in the -X version) so we don't bump it to Synaptic and then bump it back to apturl. It just feels weird. I noticed that aptdaemon is packaged in Debian. Does aptdaemon trigger its own user interface for auto-installing stuff, or does the application using it have to create its own UI? -- Kind regards, Loong Jin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840292 Title: uses synaptic to install samba which is not on the CD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus-share/+bug/840292/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
