Now, that's interesting. I had a look again and it seems a branch was created for Gnome 3, but there are just a lot of translations.
On the other hand, the devs have repeatedly stated that they've got seahorse-plugins building against GTK 3: http://git.gnome.org/browse/seahorse- plugins/commit/?id=17f60f9087970b4b0084cebe1367330bdd5eb634 http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-keyring- list/2010-October/msg00002.html And Gentoo seem to have successfully built seahorse-plugins for Gnome 3: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/app- crypt/seahorse/seahorse-3.0.2.ebuild As fas as the security vulnerability is concerned, you're of course right in the strictest sense of the word. No system is going to be immediately susceptible to attack because there's no seahorse-plugins in the repos. But an increase in the number of unsigned and unauthenticated files being handled can clearly be no good security. And with no seahorse-plugins and easy right click, that's what we're looking at. Precious few have heard of gpg and bothered to master the command line. Roger On 01/10/11 06:33, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > This is not a security vulnerability. > > The seahorse-plugins developers have yet to release even an alpha of a > GNOME 3 compatible version. > > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/seahorse-plugins/ > > ** Tags added: upgrade-software-version > > ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862609 Title: seahorse-plugins gone in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seahorse-plugins/+bug/862609/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
