On 02/11/2011 20:08, Emilien Klein wrote:
> Indeed, the fix is released upstream and in Debian Sid, but you're
> right, in Ubuntu it isn't yet released (that's what we're currently
> working on...)
Okay, let's set the status accordingly -- it'll get set to fix released when the
sync happens.
affects ubuntu/nautilus-image-manipulator
status fixcommitted
affects ubuntu/nautilus-image-manipulator
> To have the Nautilus extensions work with Nautilus 3, release 1.1 of
> python-nautilus is needed. However, in Oneiric we integrated the needed
> patches before upstream released 1.1 [0], which resulted in the
> 1.0-0ubuntu2. As far as Ubuntu is concerned, the dependency can be made
> on >= 1.0-0ubuntu2 (but NOT 1.0-0ubuntu1 since the patches are not
> present in there).
>
> The reason why the Debian package lists >= 1.1 is that Debian upgraded
> it's python-nautilus directly from version from 0.6.1 to 1.1 [1].
Ah, I see. That makes sense. Sorry, I didn't read the description properly. In
this case, I think we should sync python-nautilus 1.1 and
nautilus-image-manipulator 0.4-1 from Debian into Precise, and then make a
separate upload of nautilus-image-manipulator into oneiric-proposed.
--
Kind regards,
Loong Jin
** Changed in: nautilus-image-manipulator (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849361
Title:
Extension not working in Oneiric
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-image-manipulator/+bug/849361/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
