Quoting Paul Sladen ([email protected]): > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote: > > I think I would be putting all the formats in one package, or using > > fonts-[foundry]-fontname-console. > > I've uploaded a bump of 'ubuntu-font-family-sources' Source with the > console-font building code uncommented[0][1]: > > $ dpkg -L fonts-ubuntu-font-family-console | grep psf > /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-R-8x16.psf > /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-BI-8x16.psf > /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-B-8x16.psf > /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-RI-8x16.psf > > This second binary is in addition to the current main > 'ttf-ubuntu-font-family' binary. I would be grateful for advice about > what would be the best name for a renamed main binary package.
Hmm, that seems tricky. I'm personnally nnot entirely happy with fonts-ubuntu-font-family-whatever. It seems weird to repeat "font" in the pkg name and "family" is not exactly a font name. Indeed, how about simply "fonts-ubuntu" for the package providing the TTF|OTF fonts and fonts-ubuntu-console for the package providing the console fonts. Is there a chance that there is a fonts-ubuntu-somethingelse for another font family provided by the "ubuntu" foundry? CC'ing you, Paul though I'm unsure this is needed as you're probably subscribed to the LP bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724022 Title: Wishlist: Enable use of Ubuntu Mono as .psf console-setup font To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-family/+bug/724022/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
