Serge Hallyn writes ("[Bug 865515] Re: virtual machines should not have nat on
servers"):
> Agreed the default isn't ideal for servers, but I'm not convinced there
> is a good wya to set up a works-everywhere ideal solution for servers.
> I would assume that any site which cares enough about the network
> performance to object to a NATed bridge would have serveral NICs, some
> perhaps bonded - and leaving configuration to the admin is best.
The problem with NAT is not performance, it is the unwanted address
translation. In a server setup, you want a simple bridge. The
individual VMs will be allocated their own real addresses (either by
the local dhcp server, or statically) just as you would with a
physical server.
Ian.
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865515
Title:
virtual machines should not have nat on servers
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/865515/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
