Also, Steve's comment above that "The precise eglibc on amd64 and armel has 2.6.24 as a minimum kernel version" is demonstrably false. MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED in precise on arm* is still set to 2.6.31. In light of that, my above chroot-refreshing dance won't help Nick at all.
Other than "newer is better", has anyone actually made a cogent argument for why we want our non-x86 ports to have a higher MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED than amd64 and i386 do? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921078 Title: FATAL: kernel too old ← how old is too old? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/921078/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
