On 5/31/07, LarsBjerregaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This is FIXED in Debian! I'm sorry, but I have to say that I find it
> disheartening, that bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
> source-2.6.20/+bug/116996 is still unconfirmed+undecided, bug
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
> source-2.6.20/+bug/117447 is unconfirmed+undecided, and bug
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
> source-2.6.20/+bug/117314 is unconfirmed, though recognized as status
> high.
>
> Please devs! You are probably overburdened, that's understood. BUT....
> this bug is wrecking the systems of a hell of a lot of users, and if far
> worse than the X-oops update you released some time ago. This one is
> GRAVE, as the Debian bug correctly states. Please please... fix this.
> Thank you.

I'm monitoring the situation, and trying to decide what is the best
way to resolve this.

The reversion from libata for PATA to the older IDE drivers was done
to fix a large number of bugs people were experiencing with the feisty
final kernel.  Happily it has fixed a number of problems, and many
systems are now correctly working for the first time.

Unhappily, the bad behaviour that other people are experiencing with
the reversion wasn't intended.  A wholesale re-reversion of the libata
isn't an option because this will cause devices to change again for
everyone, and everyone will be quite understandably upset.

The ideal solution to this is to selectively re-revert to libata for
the people experiencing these problems.  Unfortunately, this takes
time to work out exactly what hardware isn't working and to only
revert that.  Please continue sending bug reports.

Thanks

-- 
latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to