On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:37:20 -0000 Rogério Theodoro de Brito <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:37, KarlGoetz <[email protected]> wrote: > > please explain why you think this is opinion > > Debian opinion != FSF opinion Indeed. And != Ubuntu opinion too. > Furthermore, vrms works by looking at the section of the package to > base its decisions on. If it reports something incorrectly, then there > are two possibilities (which not exclude one from another): > > 1. there is a bug in vrms > 2. there is a bug in the packaging, where an incorrect section of the > package is declared. Given this was filed against ubuntu when Gobuntu was being developed, I'm tempted to suggest this bug should be marked 'invalid'. thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group *** I've changed GPG key to 6C097260 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006 Title: CC-by-sa reported as non-free To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vrms/+bug/144006/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
