2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan <robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com> > Hi. >
Hi Robert, please check your subscription. I'm still told that you're not subscribed! Mine output after patch looks same (attached). > in fact, it's different. It's no more an overflow error, but an I/O error! have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch? in the latter case, I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to see if we're still on the overflow side. On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Arnaud Quette <aquette....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Robert and Dmitry, > > > > I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same > EOVERFLOW > > issue. > > > > @Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the libusb.c > part > > :-/ > > > > to both, the attached patch should fix your issue. > > please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix. > > > > I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's "blind coded" (Ie, > > just compiled, not tested with HW) > > > > cheers, > > Arnaud > cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
