That's fine (and I will look into it), but did this deliberately change
between 0.5.3r449 and 0.5.3r512? Surely there were patches in r449 that
did not trip up buildpackage.
Per my description, the buildpackage route worked fine on 0.5.3r449.
Reopening just to get an answer for this. If "yes" then I don't think
there's an issue. If "no" can you explain why there's a difference?
Perhaps this indicates a bug in some other library?
** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Incomplete
** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992543
Title:
0.5.3r512 cannot be built with dpkg-buildpackage due to "unexpected
upstream changes"
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vpnc/+bug/992543/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
