@Christopher: > Why are you changing the status when all the actions items requested of you in > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/738657/comments/7 are > not complete?
>From my perspective I completed the actions items requested of me above. If you think I did not, please explain clearly. > It's a simple matter of reading what has been requested of you, and providing > the results, I re-read your comment 7 and my understanding is that you requested two things of me: (a) run apport; and (b) run a newer kernel. I did (a) in comments #8 to #23 on March 31; and I did (b), which was much more onerous, on May 7 in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/738657/comments/28 > It's can be considered disrespectful to blatantly disregard what triagers > request of you, > then complain about how the status is put back to the appropriate one. I did not "blatanty disregard" what was requested of me. I surely misunderstood it. Misunderstandstanding come from mis-communication or from non-communication. Your change of the status to INCOMPLETE without explanation is non-communication. It does not explain (a) what you think that I did wrong; (b) why you are of different opinion than Brad (who set the status to CONFIRMED); and (c) what you would like me to do to fix the report. If you think that what I did is not enough (or if you think that I did not do anything and that I am blatantly disregarding what you requested of me), you have to tell me in more detail what you would like me to do, else I can only second-guess and assume your intention. Simply insisting that INCOMPLETE is the appropriate status seems to me to serve only one purpose: ignoring the bug until it expires from the tracker, wiping it under the carpet and hoping that nobody else will notice. My assumptions are: (1) the kernel in 12.04 is newer than the latest development image on March 31; and probably also newer than the latest upstream kernel on that same day, so it is enough to test with the kernel in 12.04. (2) my hardware has not changed and so there is nothing new to be added by running apport again. (3) if I made a mistake, I will be told how to fix it. > so that your problem may be addressed. Let's be clear: it is not my problem. My problem was fixed with the blacklisting of the faulty modules. I am satisfied with my machine as it works now. Even if that solution was not available to me, I have easy alternatives to address "my" problem, including running Windows (which I anyway paid for when I bought the notebook). LibreOffice, Firefox, Thunderbird, and the other apps I need run equally well in Windows. My interest in seing this bug fixed is much smaller than the interest of those whose reputation is at stake for producing and distributing malfunctioning software. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738657 Title: Broadcom BCM43225 no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/738657/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
