On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:05:16PM -0000, DaveHansen wrote: > We can certainly do a lot better than let a package install while silently > letting "large chunks of its brain" be missing. As you said, > /etc/init/mountall*.conf are much more than mere config files: they're > large chunks of mountall's brain.
I would certainly welcome it if we had better tooling options around this, but that's really out of scope for a bug report against mountall, which is already using the existing interfaces as designed. That would be better discussed on the ubuntu-devel mailing list. > I also can't imagine a once-a-minute warning message saying "mountall > waiting for $FOO to complete" could complicate the code that much, or > even an override key that would give the user some hope of reaching a > shell. Well, without a reproducible scenario where mountall actually stalls in this way, we'd be working in the dark here. And missing upstart jobs is not at all a common failure scenario. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839166 Title: mountall hangs while trying to send dbus? messages for /proc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/839166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
