@callegar - that's all well and good, and I agree, but this is unlikely to get solved in dnsmasq (though that would be ideal).
@jdthood: 1. Would have been the sane option for an LTS release (and server installs should use traditional resolv.conf model, if that's not the case) 2. Well, commenting the line is not too bad, except that other resolvconf bugs mean that doing so actually results in no name resolution at all 3. I'd suggest that's very hard to impossible -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842 Title: Precise NM with "dns=dnsmasq" breaks systems with non-equivalent upstream nameservers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1003842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
