** Description changed: My coworker Joe said apport-collect is not workin' I slapped my hand against my head lets find where that bug is lurkin' + + SRU TEST CASE: + - Subscribe to this bug (or pick any other bug against linux) + - Run "apport-collect -p linux 1004029" + - With current precise version, you get a backtrace like in comment 20; with the -proposed version that should be gone.
** Description changed: My coworker Joe said apport-collect is not workin' I slapped my hand against my head lets find where that bug is lurkin' + FIX: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core- + dev/ubuntu/precise/apport/ubuntu/revision/1961 + SRU TEST CASE: - Subscribe to this bug (or pick any other bug against linux) - Run "apport-collect -p linux 1004029" - With current precise version, you get a backtrace like in comment 20; with the -proposed version that should be gone. + + REGRESSION POTENTIAL: Negligible, just replaces a direct dictionary + access with a .get() variant; if the ubuntu.py hook should be broken + further on, and it crashes, that still won't stop apport from reporting + the bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004029 Title: ubuntu general hook assumes reports have a ProblemType field To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1004029/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
