While I know that glxgears is not a reliable benchmark, the following
demonstrates the issue between nvidia-96 and nouveau. I have two
machines with the same hardware, and both use an nVidia Quatro4 900 XGL.
Both are running as non-Unity (gnome-classic) & both are set to use
compiz identical (I can easily rotate the desktops w/Ctrl-Alt-mouse &
flib between w/Ctrl-Alt-rightarrow etc). The difference is that one is
running 11.04 w/nVidia-96, the other is 12.04 w/nouveau. Running
glxgears on each one results in:
Glxgears on the on running 11.04
glxgears -info
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
GL_RENDERER = Quadro4 900 XGL/AGP/SSE2
GL_VERSION = 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.20
GL_VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation
GL_EXTENSIONS = <snipped for brevity - but happy to post if helpful>
6578 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1315.524 FPS
7383 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1475.597 FPS
7594 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1518.743 FPS
7321 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1464.091 FPS
7351 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1470.171 FPS
$ sudo lshw -C display
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL]
vendor: nVidia Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a3
width: 32 bits
clock: 66MHz
capabilities: pm agp agp-2.0 vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=nvidia latency=248 maxlatency=1 mingnt=5
resources: irq:16 memory:fd000000-fdffffff memory:d0000000-d7ffffff
memory:dc780000-dc7fffff memory:fe9e0000-fe9fffff
Glxgears on the on running 12.04:
$ glxgears -info
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
GL_RENDERER = Mesa DRI nv25 x86/MMX/SSE2
GL_VERSION = 1.2 Mesa 8.0.2
GL_VENDOR = Nouveau
GL_EXTENSIONS = <snipped for brevity>
4005 frames in 5.0 seconds = 800.934 FPS
4248 frames in 5.0 seconds = 849.541 FPS
4240 frames in 5.0 seconds = 847.968 FPS
3910 frames in 5.0 seconds = 781.843 FPS
4242 frames in 5.0 seconds = 848.253 FPS
$ sudo lshw -C display
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL]
vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: a3
width: 32 bits
clock: 66MHz
capabilities: pm agp agp-2.0 vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=nouveau latency=32 maxlatency=1 mingnt=5
resources: irq:16 memory:fd000000-fdffffff memory:d0000000-d7ffffff
memory:dc780000-dc7fffff memory:fe9e0000-fe9fffff
Quite a difference in performance between the two.
That said: I fully realise that Ubuntu can't release an updated nvidia-96
until nVidia does. And from following this nvidia forum thread, it doesn't look
like it will be anytime soon:
<http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=179489>
<http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=179489&page=6>
So for those of us that require nvidia-96, my suggestion is to follow the nvida
forum thread instead of creating a forum here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948053
Title:
nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 uninstallable on Precise
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/948053/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
