I don't see conflicts with the spread design
(http://design.canonical.com/2012/03/task-switching-in-ubuntu-and-a
-introduction-to-the-spread/). The drag & drop onto the launcher should
trigger compiz scale, spread or whatever type of window switcher. And of
course then dragging onto the appropriate window should bring that to
front - whatever type of window switcher used when clicking (or dragging
in this case) onto the launcher icon.

And yes, I also wondered very much that this does not work on Unity.
When I tested earlier versions of Unity I wasn't either reporting that
as a bug as I was sure they know and fill finish that until 12.04 final.

But by all this complaining about unity, let me say that I evaluated all
the desktop environments around for several times lately and came back
to unity. There are several very nice features and I fully understand
Canonical for doing their own way. The best alternatives around do -
more or less - copy Windows (again). Unity has a few core features that
make the difference in being more productive than on Windows.

Remember: Desktop, Task and window switching features are core features
of a desktop environment. For people just using one app during the day
it is pretty irrelevant which DE they use. For all those using more apps
and more windows opened on more desktops the OS that will win the OS war
will be that to handle this more efficiently. And I think Unity is on a
good way.

But of course, missing functionality like this to be fixed ASAP - not
just for the next Ubuntu-Version!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607796

Title:
  Dragging and holding a selection over an entry in the Launcher should
  spread out windows belonging to that application

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/607796/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to