Wrong, Sam. If you were to create a new "really big" partition for use on a mobile rack or an USB-disk for data exchange with the "outer world", what would be your choice? I think, NTFS as the "common denominator" which is somehow understood by the most OSes (and, what might be even more important) "appliances" like media players (which have a linux on board, but cannot handle anything except of FAT/NTFS on drives attached to them). Another case (well, my one) is a sorta "legacy" - NTFS disks which were moved from a windoze HTPC to an ubuntu NAS. Would you want me to re-format all those disks?
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392204 Title: Huge CPU usage by mount.ntfs process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntfs-3g/+bug/392204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
