Dmitrijs, is there any (theoretical) risk of false positives here, with
the partitionable raid rules becoming active and as a result
*mis*assembling something which isn't meant to be a partitionable raid?
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968074
Title:
Partitionable raid ignored by 65-mdadm-blkid.rules
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/968074/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
