Liviu Beraru, regarding your comments https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/561030/comments/41 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/561030/comments/42: >"This was a confirmed bug."
No, it was and is not. The following action is Brad Figg's bot checking for your apport-collect: Brad Figg (brad-figg) on 2011-05-04 Changed in linux (Ubuntu): status: New → Confirmed The following comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/561030/comments/35 , is an unverifiable "Me Too!" comment, because the commenter has not reported a seperate report. For more on this, please see the Ubuntu Bug Control and Ubuntu Bug Squad article: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/BestPractices#X.2BAC8-Reporting.Focus_on_One_Issue and Ubuntu Community article: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#Bug_Reporting_Etiquette >"Are you trying to delete it just because there was no activity?" This question is ridiculous. >"Have you removed the bug..." My action in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/561030/comments/40 was putting the Status in Incomplete due to minimum requirement information being requested. This is in line with both Ubuntu Kernel Team, Ubuntu Bug Control, Ubuntu Bug Squad, and Ubuntu Community policies. For more on both please see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelTeamBugPolicies#Incomplete_Bugs https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance >"or have you observed any contrary facts?" The computer I am using now, and the other, different computer I have does not exhibit this issue. However, neither are of the same hardware type you reported. Hence, this issue is correlated to your specific hardware. >"If not, then the bug is still valid." No, that's not how it works. Launchpad bug reports don't stay open just because they were opened. They stay open because they presently impact the Ubuntu Community, and are demonstrated to be bugs with the minimum requirement information being provided. >"Do you really expect me to ping this bug report every week just to keep it >alive?" Again, ridiculous question. >"I am using another machine now so I cannot test any new kernels. Another thing: as I am not using the S12 any longer (graphics card died), you can close this bug report as far as I'm concerned." Ok. This bug report is being closed due to your last comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/561030/comments/42 regarding the hardware no longer being operational. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status. >"But this doesn't mean, the system clock is working on that machine." Agreed, could be a hardware/BIOS issue instead. We do not know. >"It means only, I am not using the machine anymore and I cannot test any new kernels." Ok. Thank you again for taking the time to report this and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please submit any future bugs you may find. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561030 Title: System clock runs about two times slower if no connection to internet To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/561030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
