** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ TBD
+ 
+ [Test Case]
  Steps to reproduce the problem:
-  1 - a touch is part of some gesture and that touch is the only one whose 
ownership hasn't come yet
-  2 - an update event with "pending end" property set comes for that touch
-  3 - an ownership event comes for that touch
+  1 - a touch is part of some gesture and that touch is the only one whose 
ownership hasn't come yet
+  2 - an update event with "pending end" property set comes for that touch
+  3 - an ownership event comes for that touch
  
  Expected outcome:
-   the gesture that has this touch becomes owned and grail client finally 
receives all queued events from that gesture. That touch should be effectively 
considered as ended (from grail clients' point of view) even though its final 
End event didn't come yet from frame.
+   the gesture that has this touch becomes owned and grail client finally 
receives all queued events from that gesture. That touch should be effectively 
considered as ended (from grail clients' point of view) even though its final 
End event didn't come yet from frame.
  
  Actual outcome:
-   the gesture that has this touch stays as unowned. grail client still 
receives no events from that gesture.
+   the gesture that has this touch stays as unowned. grail client still 
receives no events from that gesture.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ TBD
+ 
+ A new regression test case has been added for this issue. All previous
+ functional and regression test cases continue to pass.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026962

Title:
  grail doesn't work properly if ownership comes for touch whose end is
  pending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/grail/+bug/1026962/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to