Thank you for the review! On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 22:13 +0000, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > It's difficult to audit things when they are only partially > implemented, or in this case, partially working in the archive. All > this with little documentation. On top of that I was fiddling with an > account on uccs.landscape.canonical.com and now it only returns 503. > If people would like a meaningful review, high-level design documents > and documentation on how to set things up should be provided. I was > able to muddle my way through some low-level stuff to test UCCS, so I > won't block on this anymore, so here is my cursory high-level review:
Just as an FYI if you're still interested there is a system diagram and message sequence chart of how things fit together in the documentation directory: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~remote-login-service-team/remote-login- service/trunk/files/head:/docs/ But it sounds like you figured it all out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037296 Title: [MIR] remote-login-service To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remote-login-service/+bug/1037296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
