Still seeing this in the latest quantal wallpaper. The default purple
wallpaper is grainy and looks low quality.
The others in quantal are better than precise though.
** Description changed:
Ubuntu wallpapers are low quality. They often are low resolution, have
JPEG artefacts and/or visible noise. This degrades the quality feel of
the desktop itself.
The low resolution is self explanatory. Many people use a monitor
resolution that is 1920 pixels wide. This should be easy to support as
even the lowest quality digital camera is higher resolution than that.
By comparison, "gnome-backgrounds" uses mostly 2560x1600 or 1920x1200.
Often JPEG artefacts are visible in areas of very slight gradation.
Though in precise I think there is a bigger problem with noise. Neither
of these should be visible on the desktop. Please increase the JPEG
encoding quality, and the image smoothness before that.
Compare ubuntu-wallpapers with those from gnome-backgrounds. Though
gnome-backgrounds are not great quality either, they are far better
prepared than ubuntu-wallpapers.
-
- I repeat: This degrades the quality feel of the desktop.
** Also affects: ubuntu-wallpapers
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ayatana-design
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016824
Title:
Ubuntu wallpapers are low quality (low resolution, JPEG artefacts,
noise)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/1016824/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
