Just saw that this has been "rejected".

How on earth can this NOT be a bug? As I said I nowhere told the system
to be so insane and use Australian mirros (that it does is probably a
bug too). As an Ubuntu user I do not care what mirrors are used but I
expect them NOT to be broken.

This bug has been created exactly to cause somebody fix what is broken.

How do you (who has "rejected" this bug) expect a user who is confronted
with an updated manager that first suggests updates and then fails
downloading them (for days!) to proceed??

-- 
File not found for suggested update
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58560

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to