On 16 November 2012 20:13, Robert Roth <[email protected]> wrote:
> Easy decision to change the label, hard decision to find out what to change
> it to be informative, concise, and not too technical.

Maybe :-)  Let's see what some other programs say…

apt-get: The following packages have been kept back
aptitude: The following packages have been kept back

I'd say that “kept” is the way to go here.  However…

> Also note that the summary text  ("n packages will be held back and not
> upgraded") (below the changes tree) will also need an update

Looking at the code for this window, it *does* try to distinguish
between kept and held (although the text for “n packages being kept
back” is missing).  The quoted text is associated with the held count,
so would make it correct given accurate summary information.

It seems that rpackagelister.cc (getSummary) is no longer
distinguishing between held and kept packages, although it remains
instrumented to do so.

rgchangeswindow.cc still has a “To be kept” in addition to held.

Looks like something has fallen away over time here, and this is something
to look at before fixing the apparent string issues.  I am not very
familiar with synaptic, but can take a look later next week when I get
some available time.

> What do you think of Upgradeable  in place of Unchanged and "n packages
> upgradeable but not upgraded" in the summary?

As long as you mean, “Upgradeable, kept back”  However, to save
on translations, the string “To be kept” (from rgchangeswindow.cc) may be
suitable.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398184

Title:
  Synaptic sometimes lists 'unchanged' in to-do list - confusing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/398184/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to