The "click the icon to select the contents" feature is just a bonus, not
something important to retain. However, I see two design flaws with the
GtkSearchEntry design as described.

First, it makes no visual distinction between a live search field and a
submitted search field. Putting the search icon at the trailing end
suggests that it is a button you can click to perform the search; this
is how it behaves in Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Wikipedia, for
example (not to mention Nautilus 3.4 and earlier). But if you do click
it -- without realizing that its appearance has just changed -- far from
performing your search, it erases it! This would be a problem for USC.

Second, toggling between the search icon and a clear icon means that for
applications that use submitted searches, the search icon would be
absent most of the time. This isn't a problem in USC, which uses live
search, so search field contents are always temporary. But for example
in a Web browser, a standalone search field retains the most recent
search terms so that later you can adjust them and try again. In this
situation, a GtkSearchEntry would usually show only a clear icon. It
would be ironic if the only time the field contained a search icon was
when it isn't being used for a search.

I doubt either flaw could be fixed without breaking the GtkSearchEntry
API to introduce a flag for distinguishing live/submitted search fields.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082252

Title:
  Search widget is not consistent with the rest of the OS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1082252/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to