The regular kernel package depends upon a bootloader in the archive and this one should at least recommends one too. If there are other signed bootloader in the archive there is no reason that they can't fullfill it too. Right now it's just the signed grub though.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Dave Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > I disagree; it needs a signed boot loader; whether it's grub or not is a > different matter. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086981 > > Title: > Signed Kernel should depend on grub-efi-amd64-signed > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1086981/+subscriptions > -- Mario Limonciello [email protected] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086981 Title: Signed Kernel should depend on grub-efi-amd64-signed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1086981/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
