I second that. I run cpufreqd with this patch applied since 2012-04-05 on my laptop for everydays work which is heavily loaded and cpufreqd makes a big difference for me with respect to noise and battery lifetime under heavy load. The apparent lack of interest in fixing that is puzzling: is Ubuntu not interested in good user experience for laptop users?
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507 Title: cpufreqd assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/cpufreqd: free(): invalid pointer: 0x09067b10 *** To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpufreqd/+bug/733507/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
