Given recent revelations , I think the discussion regarding the ethics
leaving some scopes in the  default and even their inclusion in the
repositories repositories should be revisited.

If you want me to be more explicit:

- We know that youtube is part of PRISM.
- We don't know if Amazon joined PRISM or not. The only big US company we know 
refused to "cooperate by making NSA access easier" is twitter. Amazon is still 
a US-located company and thus is bound to the law and court orders that allow 
this , and so is twitter.

I think this should be a concern to non-US citizens using Ubuntu. In the
case of Amazon, searches are made from Canonical's servers. But that may
not be enough of a protection. NSA could target specific communications
between Canonical and US servers. If they knew a special individual is a
ubuntu user they could listen to the home searches of all users in order
to attempt to datamine them. I think that the scope of PRISM and the
extremes that we now know NSA is capable of should make Canonical
reconsider these decisions as they now have risks much higher than
Amazon learning what sort of porn you like.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054776

Title:
  Don't include remote searches in the home lens

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-lens-shopping/+bug/1054776/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to