On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 12:48 +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > I compared upstart's halt/poweroff implementation to sysvinit's, and > there are a few differences which might be relevant. After #define > translation, the halt/poweroff bit in sysvinit does: > > reboot(RB_ENABLE_CAD); > kill(1, SIGTSTP); > if (do_poweroff) > reboot(RB_POWER_OFF); > reboot(RB_HALT); > > The fallthrough appears to be deliberate; RB_ENABLE_CAD seems at least > useful; and is it possible that the kernel's getting stuck before > poweroff because init hasn't been SIGTSTPed? > This is pretty much the same as upstart's implementation ... the only difference is that I use a switch() rather than a fall-through.
The kernel just has a switch() there too, so it's definitely not that. Scott -- Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- upstart fails to power off my system https://launchpad.net/bugs/59134 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
