Good point! It would be nice to see us switch main over.
In terms of blockers, this needs a team bug subscriber. And it needs a
MIR for tslib too.
But besides that, it looks pretty good. sdl1.2 was already in main,
this has few bugs, is well maintained in Debian, we're in sync with
Debian. It doesn't use a symbols file, but does explicitly use -V with
2.0.0, which makes sense.
I know that sdl1.2 is already in main, but I figure it would be nice to
get security opinion on sdl2, so assigning to ubuntu-security for a
quick look or at least a statement saying it doesn't need a quick look.
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/1256185/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
