> Is there a technical reason why ipsec-tools is not good enough? ipsec-tools hasn't been touched in years. strongSwan upstream on the other hand are actively fixing the bugs I report on a daily basis:
- https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/activity strongSwan lets us do other cool things, like TNC (see pages 30→44, onwards): http://strongswan.org/docs/OSTD_2013.pdf > I'd prefer not to support two ipsec solutions in Ubuntu, so if we moved to strongswan, we would want to demote ipsec-tools. What would it take to demote ipsec-tools? Yes, I would like ipsec-tools demoted as a part of this (and I was actually surprised that it's main). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1266066 Title: [MIR] strongSwan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1266066/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
